Immigration control not slamming doors

Like many others, I didn´t vote for Ms. Clinton when I voted against Mr. Trump. As some of you know I have not hidden my aversion to him under a basket. Saying that, I agree with many of you who are protesting the new travel restrictions slammed into place just this weekend. First, most illegals are from areas outside the Islamic world. In Europe the many vicious thugs with bombs, knives, guns were nationals of one country or another in the EC. They probably could have gotten a turist visa quickly as on paper, with a French or Belgian passport, they would be considered white boys and girls.  The question of land-border controls is a different issue. Millions of Hispanos have fled  to the United States to escape  the  general misery of their country. Everybody is talking about the rights of immigrants to invade the USA because they want to. The philosophy behind their demands seems to be if they want to do it, it must be OK because they want to do it. >In this way   we become our own source of inspiration and our own source of ethical authority: it´s good if I want to do it.  No. No. No!  Travel restrictions is another issue. After years of off and on again immigration efforts let´s accept that there is going to be real control  of our borders.  With suggestions, and less mass scenes, poetic posters and noise, will we be able to refine those controls so that we can live with them. We need hundreds of thousands of guest workers every year. With an immigration policy that defines our needs  we can offer immigrants  a future in our country that is advantageous to the “land of the tired, the hungry, the weary and the oppressed”. We do have every right to open the door to our house to those we want in.